- Kes wrote:
- There is a difference between a nationalist and a nazi. For all two of those, the first and last two, you missed the point. The third one proves I'm a nationalist.
There's a bunch of Swatzikas and other Nazi-related things on your blog. Surely you can forgive the misconception.
- Kes wrote:
- The third one, did you read the caption? It was a song about reverting back to Paganism and shutting out Christianity. I am a Pagan. I am not fond of Christianity.
It's also a bunch of gifs glorifying Nazi Germany. If you say you're not a Nazi, then you're not a Nazi, I'm just saying.
It should also be important to note that Hitler was a Christian, and Mussolini (i.e. Hitler's biggest ally not named Hideki Tojo) was the one who repaired relations with the Pope after years of friction between the Vatican and the state of Italy... - Kes wrote:
- The second one, I am not a fan of race mixing, hence the nationalist. I could further explain but, WCC isn't the place; PM me or message me on Tumblr.
I'm not very political to begin with, so I'm not going to start an argument on that front. but wow lol
- Kes wrote:
- "You're just defending yourself yadadyadayadddaaaa"
yes. I am. Because I am not a nazi. Nationalism has been around longer than nazism, and even though the only nationalism that gets attention is Nazi Germany. Do I think what Hitler is said to do was horrible? Yes. Do you have to admit he was very smart? Yes. Am I racist? They call me that, but I really have disdain for anyone who acts like thugs, and I dislike most of those "anti-racist" people or "black supremacy" people on Tumblr because they are hypocritical and just as "horrible" as us "nazis." I have seen more death threats on Tumblr from the black supremacists then the white supremacists, and I know plenty of both.
Anything else?
"said to do"
I hope you're not a Holocaust denier on top of being a... well, whatever brand of nationalist you're representing. And even if you deny that, there's still all the political repression, the fascism, aggressive expansion, and the eight or so years of war and devastation he brought onto Europe and her colonies. A war that, if you count Japan's war in the Pacific, killed millions upon millions of people on both sides, many of them innocent civilians.
Even if you say you think that was all horrible, the number of pro-Nazi stuff on your blog is really hard to ignore. I hope you don't admire the man, speaking as someone whose great-grandparents were members of the Nazi Party. Was he smart? Perhaps to an extent. He revived a failing German economy, he rebuilt and reformed the German military in spite of the Treaty of Versailles, he gave hope to a nation that had been floundering for the last twenty years in the wake of the First World War. And then he strongarmed Austria into joining into a personal union. And then he annexed Czechoslovakia. And he kept expanding, in spite of the blatant war threats from Britain and France.
He could've stopped there, and probably been remembered in a more-or-less positive light in German history (unless you're a Czech). But the man was deranged. After years of war, while still fighting the British, he
betrayed the non-aggression pact with the Russians and arbitrarily INVADED his powerful neighbor. For no reason. Because the war had slowed down, after the RAF blew apart his air force. The Nazis and the Communists were ideological enemies, of course, but that was still an idiot move that would cost him everything. Everyone saw it but him.
Any cunning he had was outweighed by his megalomaniac tendencies. He didn't listen to his advisors when they said it'd be stupid to open up a two front war, something they'd been lucky to avoid. He refused to let his generals retreat to save their troops, turning minor losses into major ones (the most famous example of this being at Stalingrad, arguably the most important battle in the war).
When s**t went wrong, who did he blame? Himself, for meddling in places he didn't belong? Nah, his advisors and generals. If there was any
one person who was responsible for Germany losing WWII, it wasn't Churchill or Stalin or Roosevelt. It was Hitler, and Hitler alone. Germany's successes in the war came from competent generals and a modern, elite military that had developed new tactics the French and other armies of Europe couldn't adapt to in time. It wasn't due to some strategic mastery on his part. He even made up s**t about his involvement in WWI for the sake of propaganda.
Plus, all the genocide of millions of Jews, gays, cripples, gypsies, political dissidents, and all those other "undesirables." The proof of which is insurmountable. It's disgusting.
Remember that the end of the war didn't earn Germany a slap on the wrist. The Allies partitioned Germany into little pieces. The Russians raped thousands of German women and murdered thousands of German men in retribution for atrocities in the East. Nazi leaders and collaborators were all hanged or shot or imprisoned, if they didn't flee to South America. Hitler destroyed Germany on top of all his other crimes, and he deserves nothing but contempt.
[SIGH OKAY RANDOM HISTORY RANT OVER I JUST WENT ON A TANGENT THERE SORRY]
I don't really care what other people believe, even if it's something radical. Honestly. I just wanted to say that I hadn't realize that about you. It just threw me off.
also you're really racist i'm sorryEDIT: Also forgot to mention that Hitler declared war on the Americans after Pearl Harbor, which was just the nail in the coffin and the cherry on the s**tcake.
LEARNING TIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMEAnyone with any historical knowledge at all knows that America's direct military involvement in WWII began with the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. Had the American carriers not been away that day, it's possible that Japan would've been able to go all willy-nilly in the Pacific unchallenged. Most people would assume that, as Japan's ally, the US declared war on Germany too as a result.
BUT WAITThe only reason the US had not joined the war sooner was because of Americia's strict policy of
ISOLATIONISM. That is, Americans didn't want to be a part of random European wars unless they were provoked, so people who wanted to become president had to stay out of random European wars, like it or not. Roosevelt
reaaallly wanted to declare war on Germany, but he couldn't, so he didn't.
And then Pearl Harbor happened, in a "day that will live on in infamy." Most of the US Pacific Fleet was destroyed and it was a big disaster that really got 'murica's panties in a knot. Most of them didn't know how bad the blow was.
However, America still couldn't technically get involved with Germany, since their "business" was with Japan alone. A lot of Japanese generals at the time were against provoking the Americans, for obvious reasons.
So Germany's in the process of invading Russian in Operation Barbarossa. The British remain defiant in the west. There's like a billion underground resistance movements going on under his nose throughout his conquered territories in Europe. Italy's bungling up things for everyone in the Balkans and Africa.
America is a huge, huge,
HUUUUGE industrial power. With the Atlantic and their military might, they're absolutely untouchable. Germany can't even conquer Britain, an island nation right across a few miles of water. What does Hitler do during this precarious time?
He issues an official declaration of war against the US, in support of his good buddies over in Japan. l o l.
(please note that the Japanese planned Pearl Harbor independently of the Germans, without Hitler's knowledge. so they didn't have to do anything. l o o o o l. git rekt #noob.)